Ben’s Weblog


My Three Questions
December 10, 2008, 10:02 pm
Filed under: 1

The first question that arose for me from this semester is how in the world are we (as a society) going to allow for equal access to technology? I am all for integrating technology into the curriculum (I am majoring in instructional technology) but I wonder how are we going to ensure that everyone has equal access to the new technologies.

 The second question that arose for me is are we using and relying too much on technology? This really arose within me with the last journal article that we read. I have witnessed students try to rely too much on technology when researching. For example I have seen students attempt to conduct research on a given historical topic by “googling” instead of first looking at their immediate resources (textbook, encylcopedias, etc.). The problem with this is they will have 100,000 + results on the topic from Google that they will need to weed through where they can get information directly from their immediate resources.  

The final question I have is when will schools begin to loosen up their restrictions on  access to various websites? I liked some of the things that we did in class. Such as manage a blog, utilize a wiki, and create a digital story. I would really like to incorporate some of these technologies into my own classroom but I sometimes feel suffocated from the restrictions placed upon us. For example I could not access this blog or the class wiki from my school, despite it being used for educational purposes.



The Future Does Not Compute
December 3, 2008, 9:49 pm
Filed under: 1

I was really intrigued by Talbott’s article/book. I actually agreed with a lot of what he wrote, or at least what I read. I think that education is geared too much toward with the artificial and not the actual. For example students now dissect animals using computer programs instead of the real thing. I understand that they can probably get more in-depth with the computer (see all of the parts) but to me personally is not the same as actually cutting into flesh and removing actual parts of an animal.

The chapter I agreed the most with was chapter 12 where Talbott discussed a student having a pen-pal from India but yet they will not talk to culturally diverse students within their own school.  I have seen a version of this firsthand. I (and probably most other teachers) have students that are reluctant to participate in class discussion but when asked to discuss a topic on my class website they are the students that write a dissertation as a response and respond the most to other students.

As an undergrad I took a mythology class as an elective and one of the assignments we had was watch Bill Moyer interview Joseph Campbell, one the foremost experts in the field. Campbell explains the power of myth on people and one of his comments was that people really feel connected to one another when they are actively engaged with one another celebrating their cultural myths. For instance a traditional dance of the Zulu or attending a Christmas mass. He claimed that when we are inundated with the artificial is when our culture/society breaks down. If you ever get a chance to come across this interview I recommend watching it.

I did disagree with his attitude that technology virtually (good play on words, huh) has no place in education. I think that dissecting a frog with a computer program would be a great tool for educators and students. They can really see the parts of a frog and view what it is doing while alive but it should not replace the real thing.



Moving beyond Education 2.0
October 1, 2008, 3:48 am
Filed under: 1

Moving beyond Education 2.0

Posted using ShareThis



Out with the old, In with the new
September 24, 2008, 8:11 pm
Filed under: 1

This weeks reading’s were interesting to me because it explained some new concepts on learning that I have not heard prior to the reading. The article by Rose and Myer really enlightened me on the different senses someone uses while learning. I felt like I do my students a disservice by using a book, lecture, and pictures when presenting a lesson (not that I don’t use any multimedia). I had the same feeling of disservice as I read through Yelland’s article, that despite I am using new media in lessons it is with the old “predetermined curriculum.” But as I read more the more I began to feel or come to the realization that these author’s have probably never taught in a school level lower than a two-year college. I do not think it is feasible to use “new media” at all times while teaching lesson’s to elementary through high-school. Feasible in the sense of time and money. I do believe that using new media is a great way to teach the curriculum but the school’s are too pressed for time and money to truly devote their full efforts to using “new media” properly. I think that within the last 20 years technology has advanced so quickly that our system of education is just not equipped to incorporate all that is useful. I think that the only way to be able to do this with any real value will require a major overhaul on education in America. Are we in need of one? I believe so. But the question really is where do we start?



Theories for Learning
September 17, 2008, 3:22 am
Filed under: 1

The reading this week left me in a state of uncertainty. I love the field of philosophy be it political philosophy, educational philosophy, etc. The main problem I have with philosophy is that every theory is “proven” to be wrong by another theory. The Alessi and Trollip reading really left me with this sense of that all of the theories discussed on education were both, the way to teach and not to teach for learning. I feel that the they did a decent job of showing both the positives and negatives of each of the learning theories: behavioralism, cognitivism, and constructivism. I could not discern if the author’s were for or against the constructivist theorists. At times it felt like they really sided with them and agreed that behavioralism “overlooked or even ignored valuable unintended outcomes,” and cognitivists do not always do what they state (cooperative and collaborative work). At other times it felt like they did not think that constructivism was the way to go either. They felt that constructivism had too many contradictions and constructivists were elitists. I feel, as do the authors, that the best approach to educating students is to use the three theories cohesively. This will help to ensure that you are meeting the needs of all learners.